Chinese authorities suggest trans-Pacific carriers add more capacity
Source
American Shipper
Post Date
09/21/2020
Chinese authorities have suggested to major container lines that they inject more capacity and less aggressively raise rates in the trans-Pacific trade as rates hit highs, adding an entirely new element to an already volatile market, carriers and forwarders tell JOC.com
The ministry of transportation and communications on Friday gave the guidance to a group of major carriers at a Shanghai meeting where new capacity reporting requirements were discussed.
Container lines¡¯ ability to adjust trans-Pacific capacity has been key to lifting their profits despite lower global container volumes. Carriers enjoyed their most profi second quarter since 2010, posting a total profit of $2.7 billion, according to the latest Sunday Spotlight report from Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis.
If carriers do in fact heed Chinese regulators¡¯ direction, ¡°it would be an unprecedented impact on the market, and more worryingly, potentially derail the carriers¡¯ ability to manage capacity in the face of extreme demand volatility,¡± said Lars Jensen, CEO and partner at SeaIntelligence Consulting. ¡°Placing a ban on blank sailings is essentially a non-issue right now in a tight market, but it is highly likely we will see another downturn ahead of us, and if carriers are barred from managing capacity, this becomes problematic.¡±
In what is still very much of an evolving scenario, carriers are digesting what they were told by the Chinese government and how it will impact their businesses going forward. Unlike the European Union, which declined to impose additional requirements on alliances in renewing the bloc exemption for consortia for five years last fall, China can act swiftly and major market impact, as it did in 2014 when it shocked the industry by rejecting the proposed P2 alliance of Mediterranean Shipping Co., Maersk and CMACGM. MSC and Maersk ultimately d the 2M alliance, while CMA CGM joined the Ocean Alliance with Cosco, OOCL, and Evergreen.
In an interview with JOC.com, Jensen said that the reported capping of rates by Chinese authorities would have limited impact on the market, considering that rates were unlikely to remain at their current levels much longer anyway. More relevant is the question of how Chinese authorities would address capacity management in practice, as carriers¡¯ ability to swiftly withdraw capacity to meet lower volumes in the second half will be key to their newfound profitability which was based on doing precisely that in the first half, he said.
¡°I as a carrier can either have a scheduled service and I up blanking half of the sailings, or I say I have no service, but I ad hoc put in extra loaders. It¡¯s the same effect,¡± Jensen said, suggesting capacity could be difficult even for China to effectively regulate in practice. ¡°Thus, this could range from a non-issue to something that is destabilizing if suddenly the carriers aren¡¯t able to effectively manage capacity. Capacity management as we have seen in 2020 is absolutely pivotal to carriers financial health.¡±
Chinese regulators on Friday asked carriers how much trans-Pacific capacity has been susped between July and October; what percentage of their volume is spot cargo; how rates are established; why rates have increased; and what carriers are doing to curb freight rates, according to an MOT document obtained by JOC.com. Regulators also noted the decline in oil fuel prices and port fees at some cargo gateways this year, and asked carriers how they are disclosing to shippers reduced fuel surges due to lower bunker f
